In re Apkudo, Inc. saw the Dallas Court of Appeals conditionally grant mandamus relief, ordering a Dallas trial court to stay a contract suit among Apkudo, FedEx Supply Chain Logistics & Electronics, and T-Mobile USA in deference to an earlier-filed Delaware lawsuit involving the same parties and subject matter. The Court observed:

Here, the two lawsuits concern the same subject matter and involve the same issues. Apkudo’s Delaware lawsuit and FedEx’s Texas lawsuit both seek a determination by the respective trial court as to whether Apkudo has breached the Subcontract and Work Order No. 2 by continuing to provide services to T-Mobile after T-Mobile and FedEx terminated their relationship. Both lawsuits also require the respective trial courts to determine whether Apkudo has violated the nondisclosure provisions of the governing contracts.

The Court also rejected the relevance of the filing date of a related Texas Rule 202 petition, and noted that “dominant jurisdiction” cases were still relevant even though interstate comity was a distinct concept. No. 05-26-00579-CV (July 22, 2026).